From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scalamandre v. Caruso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1989
151 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

June 5, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Brown, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff's "verified further bill of particulars" qualifies as an amended bill of particulars. "[A] party may amend his bill of particulars once as of course before trial, prior to the filing of the note of issue" (CPLR 3042 [g]). In any event, the defendant has not demonstrated any prejudice, and will be allowed further discovery or examinations before trial if deemed necessary by the Supreme Court. Finally, contrary to the defendant's contention, examination into the underlying merits of the plaintiff's expanded claims and whether they are barred in whole or in part by the Statute of Limitations is inappropriate at this time upon this record. Thompson, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scalamandre v. Caruso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 5, 1989
151 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Scalamandre v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:JOAN SCALAMANDRE, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 5, 1989

Citations

151 A.D.2d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

Dubose v. N.Y. City Health Hospitals Corp.

Under CPLR 3042 (b) (CPLR 3042 [former (g)]), a party is entitled to amend the bill of particulars once as of…