From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Hudson

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Aug 28, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2017-000522 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2017)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2017-000522 Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-350

08-28-2017

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Bruce L. Hudson, Lola J. Brake, and Richard Witherspoon, Defendants, Of whom Lola J. Brake is the Appellant. In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

John Clark Phillips, Jr., of Law Office of John C. Phillips, Jr., of Columbia, for Appellant. Patrick H. Nance, of Patrick H. Nance, Attorney at Law, of Columbia, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant. James Tyler Burns, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. Betsy White Burton, of Richland County CASA, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem for the minor child.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Richland County
Monét S. Pincus, Family Court Judge

AFFIRMED

John Clark Phillips, Jr., of Law Office of John C. Phillips, Jr., of Columbia, for Appellant. Patrick H. Nance, of Patrick H. Nance, Attorney at Law, of Columbia, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant. James Tyler Burns, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. Betsy White Burton, of Richland County CASA, of Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem for the minor child. PER CURIAM : Lola J. Brake appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2016). After a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Brake's counsel. AFFIRMED. WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------


Summaries of

S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Hudson

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Aug 28, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2017-000522 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2017)
Case details for

S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Bruce L…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 28, 2017

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2017-000522 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 28, 2017)