From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Beam

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 18, 2022
No. 2022-UP-388 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-388 Appellate Case 2022-000477

10-18-2022

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Debbie Faye Beam, Daniel Thomas Williams, and Christopher Lynn Beam, Defendants, Of whom Debbie Faye Beam is the Appellant and Daniel Thomas Williams is a Respondent. In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Nancy Carol Fennell, of Irmo, for Appellant. Alex Kinlaw, III, of Greenville, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant. John Brandt Rucker, of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Respondent Daniel Thomas Williams. Jonathan Ashley Neal, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Spartanburg, for Respondent South Carolina Department of Social Services. Jamia Diann Foster, of Law Office of Jamia D. Foster LLC, of Spartanburg, for the Guardian ad Litem.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 12, 2022

Appeal From Spartanburg County Usha J. Bridges, Family Court Judge

Nancy Carol Fennell, of Irmo, for Appellant.

Alex Kinlaw, III, of Greenville, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant.

John Brandt Rucker, of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Respondent Daniel Thomas Williams.

Jonathan Ashley Neal, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Spartanburg, for Respondent South Carolina Department of Social Services.

Jamia Diann Foster, of Law Office of Jamia D. Foster LLC, of Spartanburg, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM

Debbie Faye Beam appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2022). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Beam's counsel.

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J, THOMAS, J, and LOCKEMY, AJ, concur


Summaries of

S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Beam

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 18, 2022
No. 2022-UP-388 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 18, 2022)
Case details for

S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Beam

Case Details

Full title:South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Debbie Faye…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-388 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 18, 2022)