Opinion
Appellate Case No. 2012-213709 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-193
05-09-2013
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Amber M., William M., and John Doe, Defendants, Of whom William M. is the Appellant, In the interest of minor children under the age of eighteen.
Raymond Talmage Wooten, of Smith, Jordan, Lavery & Lee, P.A., of Easley, for Appellant. Patti Beverly Brady, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Pickens, for Respondent. Steven Luther Alexander, of the Alexander Law Firm, of Pickens, for Guardian ad Litem.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Appeal From Pickens County
W. Marsh Robertson, Family Court Judge
AFFIRMED
Raymond Talmage Wooten, of Smith, Jordan, Lavery & Lee, P.A., of Easley, for Appellant.
Patti Beverly Brady, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Pickens, for Respondent.
Steven Luther Alexander, of the Alexander Law Firm, of Pickens, for Guardian ad Litem. PER CURIAM : William M. appeals from the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010 & Supp. 2012). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling. AFFIRMED.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.