From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sayce v. Forescout Techs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 16, 2024
20-cv-00076-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)

Opinion

20-cv-00076-SI

02-16-2024

CHRISTOPHER L. SAYCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER RE: SCOPE OF DEFENDANTS' SUR-REPLY

SUSAN ILLSTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court is in receipt of email correspondence from the parties' counsel concerning a dispute over the scope of defendants' sur-reply to plaintiffs' motion for class certification. On January 16, 2024, the Court issued an order regarding the parties' discovery disputes, in which it granted defendants the opportunity to “file a sur-reply if warranted after plaintiffs comply with the above ordered production.” Dkt. No. 209 at 6. The Court issues this order to clarify that defendants' sur-reply is permitted to address new issues raised by the supplemental discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sayce v. Forescout Techs.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 16, 2024
20-cv-00076-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)
Case details for

Sayce v. Forescout Techs.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER L. SAYCE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FORESCOUT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 16, 2024

Citations

20-cv-00076-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)