From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saunders v. Whitehall Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 25, 2013
Civil Action 2:11-cv-00517 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00517

02-25-2013

Joachim Saunders, Plaintiff v. Whitehall Police Department and , Defendant


Judge Marbley


Magistrate Judge Abel


ORDER

Plaintiff Joachim Saunders brings this action alleging that defendants unlawfully arrested him. This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's January 14, 2013 Report and Recommendation that defendants' unopposed motion for summary judgment be granted. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation. The docket indicates that the Report and Recommendation mailed to plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. At the time plaintiff filed this action, he was incarcerated at the Franklin County Jail. He has been released from the jail, but he failed to provide the Court with an updated mailing address.

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and GRANTS defendant motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 25).

Because the Whitehall Police Department is a sub-unit of the city government, it is merely a vehicle through which the city fulfills its policing functions. As a result, the Whitehall Police Department is not a proper defendant. Williams v. Dayton Police Dept., 680 F. Supp. 1075, 1080 (S.D. Ohio 1987); Elam v. Montgomery County, 573 F. Supp. 797 (S.D. Ohio 1983).

On May 22, 2012, plaintiff pleaded guilty to trafficking in cocaine and carrying a concealed weapon. See doc. 25 at PageID 113-14. A civil rights action is not a substitute for habeas corpus. When a prisoner challenges the fact or duration of his confinement, his sole federal remedy is habeas corpus. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 500 (1973); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 787 (1994); Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641 (1997). A convicted criminal defendant cannot bring a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 if a judgment on the claim "would necessarily imply the invalidity" of his criminal conviction and that conviction has not been set aside. Heck, 512 U.S. at 487. Here a judgment for plaintiff would necessarily undermine his criminal convictions, and those convictions have not been set aside. Consequently, the complaint fails to state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT for defendants Detective G. Grinstead and the Whitehall Police Department. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

_______________

Algenon L. Marbley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Saunders v. Whitehall Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Feb 25, 2013
Civil Action 2:11-cv-00517 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Saunders v. Whitehall Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:Joachim Saunders, Plaintiff v. Whitehall Police Department and , Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

Civil Action 2:11-cv-00517 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 25, 2013)