Summary
In Saunders, the claimant was a long time employee of Chrysler, was still employed and receiving benefits, underwent periodic examinations by employer physicians, had not sought employment elsewhere, and Saunders's counsel had received a letter from Chrysler's counsel stating that there were no positions available within his restrictions at that time or in the foreseeable future.
Summary of this case from General Motor Corp. v. KaneOpinion
No. 524, 2005.
February 17, 2006.
Appeal from Superior (Kent) CA 04A-07-001.
AFFIRMED.