From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saunders v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 14, 2020
334 Conn. 917 (Conn. 2020)

Opinion

01-14-2020

Willie A. SAUNDERS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Vishal K. Garg, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Vishal K. Garg, assigned counsel, in support of the petition.

Robert J. Scheinblum, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The petitioner Willie A. Saunders' petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 194 Conn. App. 473, 221 A.3d 810 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the doctrine of procedural default applies to competency claims?

"2. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the petitioner's pleadings failed to allege sufficient cause and prejudice to overcome a procedural default?"


Summaries of

Saunders v. Comm'r of Corr.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 14, 2020
334 Conn. 917 (Conn. 2020)
Case details for

Saunders v. Comm'r of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Willie A. SAUNDERS v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jan 14, 2020

Citations

334 Conn. 917 (Conn. 2020)
222 A.3d 103

Citing Cases

Woods v. Comm'r of Corr.

(Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Saunders v. Commissioner of Correction , 194 Conn.…

Saunders v. Comm'r of Corr.

And (2) "[d]id the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the petitioner's pleadings failed to allege…