From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sauers v. Tate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 30, 1898
54 P. 452 (Okla. 1898)

Opinion

Filed July 30, 1898.

APPEAL — Dismissal. Cause dismissed for failure to file briefs in compliance with the rule of the court.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error from the District Court of Noble County; before A. G. C. Bierer, District Judge.

H. B. Martin and James B. Diggs, for plaintiff in error

Thomas H. Doyle, for defendant in error.

Action by P. Sauers against John P. Tate and others. From the judgment, Sauers brings error. Dismissed.


Opinion of the court by


No briefs have been filed in this cause, and since it is provided in the rules of practice in this court (rule 4, 5 Okla., v.) that "counsel shall file ten printed briefs in each case," and by rule 6, "In each civil case, counsel for plaintiff in error shall furnish a copy of his brief," etc., and, "in case of the failure to comply with the requirements of this rule, the court may continue, or dismiss the case, or affirm or reverse the judgment," the case will therefore be dismissed for failure to file briefs in the case in compliance with the rule.

All of the Justices concurring.


Summaries of

Sauers v. Tate

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jul 30, 1898
54 P. 452 (Okla. 1898)
Case details for

Sauers v. Tate

Case Details

Full title:P. SAUERS v. JOHN P. TATE et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 30, 1898

Citations

54 P. 452 (Okla. 1898)
54 P. 452

Citing Cases

Beckwith et al. v. Forest

Watkins Burlingame, for appellants. S.E. Gidney, for appellee, citing: Chamberlain Transp. Co. v. Coal Co.,…