From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sauceda v. Cotton

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Jan 13, 2022
No. 13-21-00432-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2022)

Opinion

13-21-00432-CV

01-13-2022

DAVID SAUCEDA, III, M.D. AND VALLEY CHILDREN'S CLINIC, P.A., Appellants, v. MALLORY COTTON AND JERAMY BRIDGES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIENDS, NATURAL PARENTS, AND AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF BABY BOY BRIDGES, Appellees.


On appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

Before Justices Hinojosa, Tijerina, and Silva

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LETICIA HINOJOSA, JUSTICE

This matter is before the Court on appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss. On December 22, 2021, appellees voluntarily non-suited all pending claims against appellants, with prejudice, rendering this appeal moot.

The Court, having considered appellants' motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed as moot. Costs will be taxed against the appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellants.").


Summaries of

Sauceda v. Cotton

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Jan 13, 2022
No. 13-21-00432-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Sauceda v. Cotton

Case Details

Full title:DAVID SAUCEDA, III, M.D. AND VALLEY CHILDREN'S CLINIC, P.A., Appellants…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: Jan 13, 2022

Citations

No. 13-21-00432-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2022)