From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sattar v. Natural Stone Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 2005
19 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2004-05397.

June 27, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O'Donoghue, J.), dated April 28, 2004, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Bay Crane Service, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim to recover damages for common-law negligence insofar as asserted against it, and the defendants Natural Stone Industries, Inc., and Cosim Realty Corp. cross-appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of the same order as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Bay Crane Service, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim to recover damages for common-law negligence insofar as asserted against the defendant Bay Crane Service, Inc., and dismissing the cross claims asserted by them against that defendant.

Kagan Gertel, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Irving Gertel of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Garcia Stallone, Melville, N.Y. (Karl Zamurs of counsel), for defendants-appellants Natural Stone Industries, Inc., and Cosim Realty Corp. White, Fleischner Fino, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Sheri E. Holland, Alisa Dultz, and Dionne Sinclair of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the cross appeal from so much of the order as granted that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim to recover damages for common-law negligence insofar as asserted against the defendant Bay Crane Service, Inc., is dismissed, as the defendants Natural Stone Industries, Inc., and Cosim Realty Corp. are not aggrieved by that portion of the order ( see CPLR 5511; DeCandia v. Calamia, 15 AD3d 436); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from and reviewed on the cross appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is payable to the defendant Bay Crane Service, Inc.

The Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the motion of the defendant Bay Crane Service, Inc. (hereinafter Bay Crane), which were for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff's cause of action to recover damages for common-law negligence and dismissing the cross claims of the defendants Natural Stone Industries, Inc., and Cosim Realty Corp. insofar as asserted against it. Bay Crane met its burden of establishing that it neither supervised nor controlled the work resulting in the plaintiff's injuries ( see Amaxes v. Newmark Co. Real Estate, Inc., 15 AD3d 321; Cooper v. Sonwil Distrib. Ctr., Inc., 15 AD3d 878), and neither created nor had actual or constructive notice of a defective condition ( see Beltrone v. City of New York, 299 AD2d 306). In opposition, the appellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact.

The appellants' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.


Summaries of

Sattar v. Natural Stone Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 27, 2005
19 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Sattar v. Natural Stone Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ABDUL SATTAR, Appellant, v. NATURAL STONE INDUSTRIES, INC., et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 27, 2005

Citations

19 A.D.3d 681 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
798 N.Y.S.2d 98

Citing Cases

Cicala v. Stearns, Conrad Schmidt Consulting Engrs.

The foregoing is also dispositive of plaintiff's Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims, as the…

Gualotuna v. Trevor Park Terrace

The court notes that although there was some testimony that the building superintendent instructed the…