From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Satizabal v. Folino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1435 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1435

11-14-2012

CARLOS SATIZABAL, Petitioner, v. LOUIS FOLINO, et al. Respondents.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of November 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the briefs, and the state court record, and upon review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa [Doc. No. 33] and the objections and responses thereto, and pursuant to the Judgment of the Court of Appeals [Doc. No. 26], it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 33] is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Objections are OVERRULED;
3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED;
4. The Motion for Stay and Abeyance [Doc. No. 40] is DISMISSED AS MOOT;
5. The Motion to Amend [Doc. No. 41] is DENIED;
6. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and
7. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE , J.


Summaries of

Satizabal v. Folino

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 14, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1435 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Satizabal v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS SATIZABAL, Petitioner, v. LOUIS FOLINO, et al. Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 14, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1435 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 14, 2012)