From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sasse v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Dec 20, 2022
662 S.W.3d 59 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 110323

12-20-2022

Ryan SASSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Nina McDonnell, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101. FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Zeb J. Charlton, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.


FOR APPELLANT: Nina McDonnell, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Eric Schmitt, Zeb J. Charlton, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.

Before Lisa P. Page, P.J., Thomas C. Clark II, J., and Renée D. Hardin-Tammons, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM. Ryan Sasse (Movant) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on certain claims and without a hearing on others. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm the judgment of the motion court.

All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2022).

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Sasse v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.
Dec 20, 2022
662 S.W.3d 59 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Sasse v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ryan SASSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO.

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

Citations

662 S.W.3d 59 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)