From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saryian v. Ramana, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 2003
305 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-06860

Argued April 7, 2003.

May 5, 2003.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Ramana, Inc., and Paul Saryian separately appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Gigante, J.), dated June 10, 2002, which denied their respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Israelson Gold, Plainview, N.Y. (Jeffrey B. Gold of counsel), for appellant Ramana, Inc.

Longo D'Apice, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Mark A. Longo and Jonathan Tabar of counsel), for appellant Paul Saryian.

Russo, Scamardella D'Amato, P.C., Staten Island, N.Y. (Carole R. Larsen of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, BARRY A. COZIER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

As a general rule, a party does not sustain its burden in moving for summary judgment by pointing to gaps in its opponent's proof, but rather, must affirmatively demonstrate the merit of its claim or defense (see Dalton v. Educational Testing Serv., 294 A.D.2d 462; Russell v. Kraft, Inc., 284 A.D.2d 386; Pace v. International Bus. Mach. Corp., 248 A.D.2d 690, 691). The defendants failed to meet their burden herein (cf. Tiano v. Nick's Lobster Seafood Rest. Clam Bar, 300 A.D.2d 469).

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.

ALTMAN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and COZIER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Saryian v. Ramana, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 2003
305 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Saryian v. Ramana, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAUL SARYIAN, SR., ETC., respondent, v. RAMANA, INC., ET AL., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 498

Citing Cases

Ruderman v. Stern

Instead, they rely upon their claim that plaintiff cannot succeed in proving his claim. Defendants, however,…

Ruderman v. Stern

Instead, they rely upon their claim that plaintiff cannot succeed in proving his claim. Defendants, however,…