From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sartor v. State Farm Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 28, 2006
187 S.W.3d 335 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. ED 85577.

March 28, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Steven R. Ohmer, Judge.

Roger Gordon Brown, Jefferson City, MO, for appellant.

Jeffrey Karl Suess, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, J., BOOKER T. SHAW, J.


ORDER


Patricia Sartor, Kim Branson, Janet Shirts, and Bethany Cross, along with their respective spouses, appeal from the trial court's judgment granting Chemical Specialties Manufacturing Corporation's motion in limine and excluding evidence regarding Vickie Olive's claim of injury and medical condition from the trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. No precedential or jurisprudential purposes would be served by an opinion restating the detailed facts and the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their purposes only explaining the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Sartor v. State Farm Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Mar 28, 2006
187 S.W.3d 335 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Sartor v. State Farm Insurance

Case Details

Full title:Patricia SARTOR, et al., Appellants, v. STATE FARM INSURANCE, et al.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Mar 28, 2006

Citations

187 S.W.3d 335 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006)