From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarra v. Hankewycz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 12, 1996
230 A.D.2d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

August 12, 1996


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Eastflo, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Sherwood, J.), dated July 17, 1995, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the facts of this case, there is an issue of fact as to whether the nonmoving defendant Michael Hankewycz was an independent contractor or an employee of Eastflo, Inc. Where the record raises "a question with respect to the nature of the relationship between the tortfeasor and his alleged principal, summary judgment is not warranted" ( Carrion v Orbit Messenger, 82 N.Y.2d 742, 744). Accordingly, the motion was properly denied. Miller, J.P., O'Brien, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Sarra v. Hankewycz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 12, 1996
230 A.D.2d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Sarra v. Hankewycz

Case Details

Full title:STARR E. SARRA et al., Respondents, v. MICHAEL HANKEWYCZ, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 12, 1996

Citations

230 A.D.2d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 625

Citing Cases

Meyer v. Martin

e Pope v. Ball, 186 AD2d 1099), the plaintiffs raised triable issues of fact as to whether Modern and ADC…

McShane v. Foster

Since there is conflicting testimony in the record as to how the accident occurred, and competing inferences…