From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sargent v. Hendrick

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Oct 20, 2010
Case No. Cv 06-1230 ST (D. Or. Oct. 20, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. Cv 06-1230 ST.

October 20, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart issued Findings and Recommendation (#62) on September 30, 2010. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

When, as here, no objections are filed, the court is not required to give the record de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir 1983). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F2d 452, 454 (9th Cir 1983). I find no error. Accordingly, I adopt the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Stewart.

Plaintiffs Motion to File Amended Complaint (#52) is denied and this case is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 20th day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Sargent v. Hendrick

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Oct 20, 2010
Case No. Cv 06-1230 ST (D. Or. Oct. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Sargent v. Hendrick

Case Details

Full title:VONDA SARGENT, as guardian ad litem for PETER LUVAIN JERVAIS, Plaintiff…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Oct 20, 2010

Citations

Case No. Cv 06-1230 ST (D. Or. Oct. 20, 2010)