finding no plausible claim where the plaintiff alleged that he received inadequate amounts of food, causing him "hunger pains, headaches, decreased energy, weight loss, and emotional distress."
Summary of this case from Bonilla v. CobbNo. 95-40733.
April 26, 1996.
S.D.Tex., 894 F.Supp. 1076.
AFFIRMED
finding no plausible claim where the plaintiff alleged that he received inadequate amounts of food, causing him "hunger pains, headaches, decreased energy, weight loss, and emotional distress."
Summary of this case from Bonilla v. Cobbfinding no futility where the plaintiff argued that only insurance company personnel would be involved in the review process, all but assuring she would not succeed."
Summary of this case from Swenson v. Eldorado Casino Shreveport Joint Ventureupholding dismissal of claims that quantities of food were inadequate as lacking an arguable basis in law or fact
Summary of this case from Craig v. Aramarkaffirming dismissal of a declaratory judgment action under nearly identical circumstances where the choice-of-forum and jury-right issues were at play
Summary of this case from Brown Water Marine Serv., Inc. v. FloydFull title:Sarff v. Continental Exp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Date published: Apr 26, 1996
Slip op. at 20. The court also relied on MD II Entm't, Inc. v. City of Dallas, Tex., 935 F. Supp. 1394, 1396…
Baby Dolls Topless Saloons v. City of DallasThe amendments to the terms "nudity", "semi-nudity", and "simulated nudity" were held violative of the First…