From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarfaty v. Recine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 2008
57 A.D.3d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 2008-04304, (Docket No. F-2194-05).

December 2, 2008.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Edlitz, J.), entered March 13, 2008, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Furman, S.M.), entered November 30, 2007, which, after a hearing, granted the mother's motion for a money judgment for an award of an attorney's fee in the sum of $16,770.

Richard W. Fulfree, Yonkers, N.Y., for appellant.

Patricia T. Bisesto, Valhalla, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Fisher and Eng, JJ. concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

"[T]he award of reasonable counsel fees is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court" ( Matter of Grald v Grald, 33 AD3d 922, 923). Under the facts of this case, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in awarding the mother a money judgment for an award of an attorney's fee in the sum of $16,770 ( see Family Ct Act § 438 [a], [b]; Matter of Israel v Israel, 273 AD2d 385).


Summaries of

Sarfaty v. Recine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 2008
57 A.D.3d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Sarfaty v. Recine

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DEBRA SARFATY, Respondent, v. RALPH RECINE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 9606
867 N.Y.S.2d 704

Citing Cases

Tornheim v. Rube

Accordingly, under the circumstances, dismissal of the petition was warranted, rather than transfer to a…

Westergaard v. Westergaard

The Support Magistrate providently exercised her discretion in granting the father's motion pursuant to…