Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01326-KLM
11-19-2012
MINUTE ORDER
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Docket No. 1; Filed May 21, 2012], filed as part of Plaintiff's original Complaint; on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 17; Filed July 9, 2012]; and on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint [Docket No. 48; Filed October 25, 2012] (the "Motion to Amend"). Defendants initially stated their opposition to the Motion to Amend, but in their Response [#60] they withdraw their objections. Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Amend [#48] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall accept Plaintiff's
Amended Complaint [#48-1] for filing as of the date of this Minute Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [#1] is DENIED without prejudice. AJB Props., Ltd. v. Zarda Bar-B-Q of Lenexa, LLC, No. 09-2021-JWL, 2009 WL 1140185, at *1 (D. Kan. Apr. 28, 2009) (finding that amended complaint supersedes original complaint).
The Court construed Plaintiffs original Complaint which he filed as a pro se litigant before obtaining counsel, as seeking a temporary restraining order, in part. The Amended Complaint [#48-1] does not renew this request.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss [#17] is DENIED as moot. See, e.g., Strich v. United States, No. 09-cv-01913-REB-KLM, 2010 WL 14826, at *1 (D. Colo. Jan. 11, 2010) (citations omitted) ("The filing of an amended complaint moots a motion to dismiss directed at the complaint that is supplanted and superseded."); Gotfredson v. Larsen LP, 432 F. Supp. 2d 1163, 1172 (D. Colo. 2006) (noting that defendants' motions to dismiss are "technically moot because they are directed at a pleading that is no longer operative").