From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sarah P. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 25, 2021
Case No.: 20-cv-1029-MMA (MDD) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-1029-MMA (MDD)

06-25-2021

SARAH ANNE P., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES [DOC. NO. 20]

HON. MICHAEL M. ANELLO, United States District Judge.

On June 4, 2020, Sarah Anne P. (“Plaintiff”) filed this social security appeal challenging the denial of her application for disability benefits. See Doc. No. 1. The Court referred all matters arising in this social security appeal to the assigned Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation (“R&R”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Civil Local Rule 72.1. See Doc. No. 4. Thereafter, the parties timely filed the administrative record and Plaintiff filed her merits brief. See Doc. Nos. 11, 13.

On March 10, 2021, the Magistrate Judge issued an R&R recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion and remand the Administrative Law Judge's decision. See Doc. No. 17. The Court adopted the R&R in its entirety and remanded the matter to the Social Security Administration pursuant to sentence four of 41 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings. See Doc. No. 18. That same day, the Clerk of Court entered judgment. See Doc. No. 19. The parties now jointly ask the Court to award Plaintiff $3, 700.00 in attorney's fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and no costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. See Doc. No. 20.

The EAJA allows a prevailing party to seek attorney's fees from the United States within thirty days of final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). “A sentence four remand becomes a final judgment, for purposes of attorneys' fees claims brought pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon expiration of the time for appeal.” Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 F.3d 852, 854 (9th Cir. 2002) (citing Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 297 (1993)); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(G); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 102 (1991) (“In sentence four cases, the filing period begins after the final judgment . . . is entered by the court and the appeal period has run, so that the judgment is no longer appealable.”). If one of the parties is the United States, either party may file a notice of appeal within sixty days of the order appealed from. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B). “A plaintiff who obtains a sentence four remand is considered a prevailing party for purposes of attorneys' fees.” Akopyan, 296 F.3d at 854 (citing Shalala, 509 U.S. at 301-02).

Here, the Court finds that Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this action for purposes of attorney's fees, the parties' joint motion is timely, and the stipulated amount of fees is reasonable . Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the parties' joint motion for at torney's fees and AWARDS Plaintiff $3, 700.00 pursuant to the EAJA.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sarah P. v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 25, 2021
Case No.: 20-cv-1029-MMA (MDD) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Sarah P. v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:SARAH ANNE P., Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 25, 2021

Citations

Case No.: 20-cv-1029-MMA (MDD) (S.D. Cal. Jun. 25, 2021)