From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santos v. Thomas

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct 22, 2015
804 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 12–56506.

2015-10-22

Jose Luis Munoz SANTOS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Linda R. THOMAS, Warden, Respondent–Appellee.

Gail Ivens, Esquire, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Matthew Brady Larsen, Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner–Appellant. Jean–Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., Aron Ketchel, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Sonja Ralston, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent–Appellee.


Gail Ivens, Esquire, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Matthew Brady Larsen, Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner–Appellant. Jean–Claude Andre, Assistant U.S., Aron Ketchel, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, Sonja Ralston, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent–Appellee.

ORDER


THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Santos v. Thomas

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct 22, 2015
804 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Santos v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:Jose Luis Munoz SANTOS, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Linda R. THOMAS, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Date published: Oct 22, 2015

Citations

804 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Santos v. Thomas

We granted en banc review and vacated the panel opinion. Munoz Santos v. Thomas , 804 F.3d 998 (9th…

In re Acevedo

The district court nonetheless concluded that "it was impossible to distinguished between [the…