From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santos v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 5, 2023
1:22-cv-00361-EPG (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00361-EPG

06-05-2023

DONICA SANTOS, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

JARED THOMAS WALKER Law Office of Jared T. Walker, PC Attorney for Plaintiff PHILLIP A. TALBERT United States Attorney MATHEW W. PILE Associate General Counsel ELIZABETH LANDGRAF Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant


JARED THOMAS WALKER

Law Office of Jared T. Walker, PC Attorney for Plaintiff

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

United States Attorney

MATHEW W. PILE

Associate General Counsel

ELIZABETH LANDGRAF

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(D), AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920

(ECF NO. 29)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount $7,130.81 (SEVEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED dollars EIGHT-ONE cents) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and zero costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).

After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to counsel, if any. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the ability to honor any assignment will depend on whether the fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.

Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to counsel, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to counsel.

This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or counsel including counsel's firm may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action.

This award is without prejudice to the rights of counsel and/or counsel's firm to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.

ORDER

Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses (ECF No. 29), IT IS ORDERED that fees in the amount of $7,130.81 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and zero costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. Further, in light of the Stipulation, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees (ECF No. 25) as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Santos v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 5, 2023
1:22-cv-00361-EPG (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Santos v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:DONICA SANTOS, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 5, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-00361-EPG (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2023)