From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santos-Ontiveros v. United States

United States District Court, District of Utah
Oct 20, 2023
2:23-cv-00483-CW (D. Utah Oct. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00483-CW

10-20-2023

RUFINO SANTOS-ONTIVEROS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER WAIVING ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE RELATING TO COMMUNICATIONS AT ISSUE IN § 2255 PETITION

CLARK WADDOUPS UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the court on the United States' Motion for Order Waiving AttorneyClient Privilege (ECF No. 5). Mr. Santos-Ontiveros has filed a § 2255 petition, claiming that the two attorneys who represented him at different stages in his underlying criminal case rendered constitutionally ineffective assistance.

“When a habeas petitioner claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, he puts communications between himself and his attorney directly in issue, and thus by implication waives the attorney-client privilege with respect to those communications.” United States v. Pinson, 584 F.3d 972, 977-78 (10th Cir. 2009); see also id. at 978 (citing “ample, unanimous federal authority” applying the same principle). “Thus, it is black letter law that a petitioner waives the attorney-client privilege for communications with the defense attorney who allegedly provided ineffective assistance.” Joseph v. United States, No. 2:19-CV-00140-JNP, 2019 WL 2060118, at *1 (D. Utah May 9, 2019) (citing Pinson, 584 F.3d at 977-78). Moreover, when a § 2255 movant raises claims that are “intertwined” with attorney-client communications, the privilege is also waived for purposes of those proceedings. Nikols v. United States, Case No. 2:06-cv-889, 2007 WL 2084841, at *2 (D. Utah July 17, 207). And “[s]uch a waiver occurs when a defendant”-like Mr. Santos-Ontiveros-“in an attempt to withdraw a guilty plea, claims that counsel provided erroneous advice about the consequences of the guilty plea.” United States v. Ahmed, No. 2:16-CR-00021, 2017 WL 6271262, at *3 (D. Utah Dec. 8, 2017). Mr. Santos-Ontiveros' Sixth Amendment claims either directly concern or are inextricably intertwined with his communications with his attorneys.

Accordingly, the United States' Motion for Order Waiving Attorney-Client Privilege (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. The court finds that Mr. Santos-Ontiveros has waived the attorney-client privilege with respect to the communications at issue in Claims 1, 2, 3, and 5 of his § 2255 petition.


Summaries of

Santos-Ontiveros v. United States

United States District Court, District of Utah
Oct 20, 2023
2:23-cv-00483-CW (D. Utah Oct. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Santos-Ontiveros v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RUFINO SANTOS-ONTIVEROS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Utah

Date published: Oct 20, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00483-CW (D. Utah Oct. 20, 2023)