From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santibanez v. Diron

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Aug 2, 2016
NO. 01-16-00231-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 01-16-00231-CV

08-02-2016

BENITO SANTIBANEZ, Appellant v. ALEJANDRO DIRON, Appellee


On Appeal from the 434th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 121-DCV-202428

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Benito Santibanez has neither paid the required fees nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West Supp. 2015); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2015). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Brown, and Huddle.


Summaries of

Santibanez v. Diron

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Aug 2, 2016
NO. 01-16-00231-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2016)
Case details for

Santibanez v. Diron

Case Details

Full title:BENITO SANTIBANEZ, Appellant v. ALEJANDRO DIRON, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Aug 2, 2016

Citations

NO. 01-16-00231-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2016)