From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santiago v. Annucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 8, 2020
20-CV-6391 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 8, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-6391 (CM)

09-08-2020

HERACLIO SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, D.O.C.C.S. ACTING COMMISSIONER; SUPERINTENDENT LEROY FIELDS, FISHKILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; JACKQUELINE HERNANDEZ, BROOKLYN PAROLE OFFICER, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL :

On September 3, 2020, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff, see ECF No. 5, advising that he wishes to withdraw this action. The Court therefore grants Plaintiff's request. This action is withdrawn pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

CONCLUSION

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.

The action is voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).

This order closes this case.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 8, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Santiago v. Annucci

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 8, 2020
20-CV-6391 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Santiago v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:HERACLIO SANTIAGO, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY J. ANNUCCI, D.O.C.C.S. ACTING…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 8, 2020

Citations

20-CV-6391 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 8, 2020)