Santana v. Harrington

Full title: JAMES E. SANTANA, Petitioner, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 14, 2011

CV 10-0164-SJO (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2011)

Opinion

JAMES E. SANTANA, Petitioner, v. KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 10-0164-SJO (JEM) United States District Court, C.D. California. January 14, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired, and no Objections have been filed. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.