Santana v. Fla. Parole Comm'n

Full title: Manuel SANTANA, Petitioner, v. The FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 9, 2013

118 So. 3d 962 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 1D12–4149.

2013-08-9

Manuel SANTANA, Petitioner, v. The FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction. Manuel Santana, pro se, Petitioner. Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.
Manuel Santana, pro se, Petitioner. Sarah J. Rumph, General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM.

Consistent with the Florida Parole Commission's concession of error, the petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED. The circuit court's order denying Santana's petition for writ of mandamus is QUASHED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Alday v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 58 So.3d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

WOLF, CLARK, and RAY, JJ., concur.