From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Santana v. Cummins

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 14, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv493-TMH (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 14, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv493-TMH (WO)

04-14-2014

ELIEZER SANTANA, Petitioner, v. JOHN CUMMINS, et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:

(1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 30) are overruled.
(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (Doc. No. 29) is adopted.
(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This case is closed.

Myron H. Thompson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Santana v. Cummins

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
Apr 14, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv493-TMH (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Santana v. Cummins

Case Details

Full title:ELIEZER SANTANA, Petitioner, v. JOHN CUMMINS, et al., Respondents.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 14, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10cv493-TMH (WO) (M.D. Ala. Apr. 14, 2014)

Citing Cases

Hammonds v. Sharp

"If a petitioner can establish cause under Martinez, he still must establish prejudice as a result of the…