From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sankara v. Martuscellor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 19, 2020
18 CIVIL 6308 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 6308 (AJN)

11-19-2020

Ahmadou Sankara, Petitioner, v. Daniel F. Martuscellor, Jr., et al., Respondents.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated November 19, 2020, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Fox's recommendations in full and denies Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Motion to Change Venue. Because Petitioner has not at this time made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).; accordingly, the case is closed. DATED: New York, New York

November 19, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Sankara v. Martuscellor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 19, 2020
18 CIVIL 6308 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2020)
Case details for

Sankara v. Martuscellor

Case Details

Full title:Ahmadou Sankara, Petitioner, v. Daniel F. Martuscellor, Jr., et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 19, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 6308 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 19, 2020)