From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanford v. Levin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 19, 2013
509 F. App'x 639 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 10-56160 D.C. No. 3:08-cv-01049-H-PCL

02-19-2013

ROBERT LIONEL SANFORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEVIN, Chief Medical Officer (CSP); et al., Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner Robert Lionel Sanford appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment to defendants because Sanford failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendants consciously disregarded Sanford's need for post-operative care, including in addressing a nasal bleed, after he had surgery for chronic sinus problems. See id. at 1057-58 (neither negligence nor difference of opinion between doctor and prisoner concerning the appropriate course of treatment amounts to deliberate indifference to serious medical needs).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sanford v. Levin

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 19, 2013
509 F. App'x 639 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Sanford v. Levin

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LIONEL SANFORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LEVIN, Chief Medical…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 19, 2013

Citations

509 F. App'x 639 (9th Cir. 2013)