From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanford v. Gemo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
2:21-cv-00824-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00824-JDP (PC)

01-11-2023

JEVON SANFORD, Jr., Plaintiff, v. G. GEMO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS

JEREMY D. PETERSON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On November 30, 2022, defendants filed a motion to compel. ECF No. 24. Plaintiff has not filed a response.

In cases in which a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition not more twenty-one days after the date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(1). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” Id.

To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of a case, for failure to comply with court orders or local rules. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary dismissal is a harsh penalty, but a district court has a duty to administer justice expeditiously and avoid needless burden for the parties. See Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002); Fed.R.Civ.P. 1.

Plaintiff will be given a chance to explain why the court should not dismiss the case for his failure to timely file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants' motion. Plaintiff's failure to respond to this order will constitute a failure to comply with a court order and will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Accordingly, plaintiff is ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the court's local rules. Should plaintiff wish to continue with this lawsuit, he shall, within twenty-one days, file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to defendants' motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sanford v. Gemo

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 11, 2023
2:21-cv-00824-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Sanford v. Gemo

Case Details

Full title:JEVON SANFORD, Jr., Plaintiff, v. G. GEMO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 11, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-00824-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2023)