Sanford v. Crispin

Full title: ROBERT LIONEL SANFORD, Plaintiff, v. M. CRISPIN, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

EDCV 09-1155-DMG (CW).[1] (C.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

ROBERT LIONEL SANFORD, Plaintiff, v. M. CRISPIN, Defendant. No. EDCV 09-1155-DMG (CW).¹ United States District Court, C.D. California. August 9, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the record and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No written objections to the Report have been received. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the action, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute, and for failure to exhaust administrative remedies as discussed in the second Memorandum and Order filed January 26, 2011 [docket no. 39].