From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanford v. Cigna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 9, 2018
No. 3:16-CV-2610-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:16-CV-2610-B-BH

10-09-2018

DOROTHY LOUISE SANFORD, Plaintiff, v. CIGNA, MERCER HEALTH AND BENEFITS, and JON C. HUNTINGTON, Defendants.


Referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED with prejudice by separate judgment under to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

SIGNED this 9th day of October, 2018.

/s/ _________

JANE J. BOYLE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Sanford v. Cigna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 9, 2018
No. 3:16-CV-2610-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Sanford v. Cigna

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY LOUISE SANFORD, Plaintiff, v. CIGNA, MERCER HEALTH AND BENEFITS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 9, 2018

Citations

No. 3:16-CV-2610-B-BH (N.D. Tex. Oct. 9, 2018)