From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandlin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 10, 1965
386 S.W.2d 537 (Tex. Crim. App. 1965)

Opinion

No. 37883.

February 10, 1965.

Appeal from the County Court at Law, Taylor County, James K. Graham, J.

Bryant, Glenn Thomas, by Allen Glenn, Abilene (On Appeal Only), for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


Appellant was convicted of the offense of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. His punishment was assessed at a fine of $250.00 and confinement in jail for thirty (30) days.

Prosecution was upon complaint and information.

The State concedes that the complaint is fatally defective for the reason that the date the offense is alleged to have been committed cannot be ascertained from a reading thereof. It appears to be 'on or about the 4th day of October A.D., 19__,'.

The complaint is not sufficient to support the information which alleges the date of the offense as 'on or about the 4th day of October 1964'. The date set forth in the complaint is beyond the statute of limitations. McLaren v. State, 167 Tex.Crim. 302, 320 S.W.2d 141; Suzuki v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 280 S.W.2d 744; Herron v. State, 150 Tex.Crim. R., 203 S.W.2d 225.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.


Summaries of

Sandlin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 10, 1965
386 S.W.2d 537 (Tex. Crim. App. 1965)
Case details for

Sandlin v. State

Case Details

Full title:Ronald SANDLIN, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 10, 1965

Citations

386 S.W.2d 537 (Tex. Crim. App. 1965)

Citing Cases

Ex Parte Gibson

The threshold issue in this case which must be addressed then is whether the instrument upon which applicant…