From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandlin v. Jarman

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1937
193 S.E. 707 (N.C. 1937)

Opinion

(Filed 24 November, 1937.)

APPEAL by plaintiff from Sinclair, J., at April Term, 1937, of ONSLOW.

J. A. Jones and Wallace White for plaintiff, appellant.

Summersill Summersill for defendant, appellee.


Civil action to recover damages alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant when the automobile driven by plaintiff collided with defendant's truck, which was standing on the highway in the nighttime, without lights, and in violation of law.

Upon denial of liability and issues joined, the jury answered the issue of negligence in favor of the defendant.

From judgment on the verdict, plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.


Upon a controverted issue of fact, the jury has responded in favor of the defendant. The court's charge to the jury is challenged in several particulars, but none of the exceptions are regarded of sufficient moment to work a new trial. No new question of law is presented by any of the assignments of error. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.


Summaries of

Sandlin v. Jarman

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1937
193 S.E. 707 (N.C. 1937)
Case details for

Sandlin v. Jarman

Case Details

Full title:FRED SANDLIN, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, R. K. SANDLIN, v. HENRY JARMAN

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1937

Citations

193 S.E. 707 (N.C. 1937)
193 S.E. 707