From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sandlain v. Warden, FCI McDowell

United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia
Jan 14, 2022
Civil Action 1:20-00424 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 14, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:20-00424

01-14-2022

BLAKE SANDLAIN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, FCI MCDOWELL, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAVID A. FABER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the court is Sandain's motion “to be allowed to respond to magistrate recommendation that 2241 is dismissed.” ECF No. 31. On November 1, 2021, the court dismissed plaintiff's petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and dismissed this matter from the court's docket. The court did so after plaintiff failed to file objections to Magistrate Judge Tinsley's Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”), entered on September 27, 2021, in the time period allotted for doing so.

For good cause shown, plaintiff's motion is GRANTED and he has until February 4, 2022, to file his any objections to the PF&R entered on September 27, 2021.

The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to plaintiff and counsel of record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sandlain v. Warden, FCI McDowell

United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia
Jan 14, 2022
Civil Action 1:20-00424 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Sandlain v. Warden, FCI McDowell

Case Details

Full title:BLAKE SANDLAIN, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, FCI MCDOWELL, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia

Date published: Jan 14, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:20-00424 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 14, 2022)