From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanderson v. Progressive Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jul 1, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-cv-00739-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Jul. 1, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-cv-00739-BAJ-RLB

07-01-2014

RICHARD SANDERSON v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.


RULING AND ORDER

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. (Doc. 3). The Magistrate Judge has issued a REPORT (Doc. 7) recommending that Plaintiff's Motion be denied, (id. at p. 7). There is no objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report.

Having independently considered Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and related filings, the Court APPROVES the Magistrate Judge's REPORT (Doc. 7), and ADOPTS it as the Court's opinion herein.

Accordingly.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 3) is DENIED for the reasons explained in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 7).

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 1 st day of July, 2014.

__________

BRIAN A. JACKSON, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Sanderson v. Progressive Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Jul 1, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-cv-00739-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Jul. 1, 2014)
Case details for

Sanderson v. Progressive Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SANDERSON v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Jul 1, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-cv-00739-BAJ-RLB (M.D. La. Jul. 1, 2014)

Citing Cases

Truxillo v. Am. Zurich Ins. Co.

Coury, 85 F.3d at 249. See also, Sanderson v. Progressive Ins. Co., 2014 WL 2993816, at * 4 (M.D. La. July 1,…

Williams v. Bolotovsky

Id. Id. (citing Truxillo v. American Zurixh Ins. Co., 20016 WL 6987127 (M.D. La. Oct. 24, 2016); Sanderson v.…