From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanderson v. Cincinnati Shaper Co. Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 17, 1987
725 S.W.2d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 51591.

March 17, 1987.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS, DANIEL T. TILLMAN, J.

Claude Hanks, St. Louis, for plaintiff-appellant.

Louis W. Riethmann, St. Louis, for John R. Wald Co., Inc.

Gary L. Gardner, Columbia, for Missouri Training Center for Men and Carl White.

William W. Evans, St. Louis, for The Cincinnati Shaper Co., Inc.


Lester Sanderson, Jr. (Plaintiff) appeals from the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Missouri Training Center for Men (Training Center) based on sovereign immunity. We affirm.

Plaintiff was an inmate at the Training Center. On November 9, 1981, he was operating a press brake machine when the ram came down on plaintiff's hand, severing four fingers of his left hand. Plaintiff brought an action for negligence against The Cincinnati Shaper Company, Inc., a/k/a Cincinnati Incorporated (the manufacturer of the machine), John R. Wald Company, Inc., (the machine's distributor and installer) and against the Training Center and Warden Carl White for allowing the machine to be installed without safety features and/or not requiring proper safety measures.

The Training Center moved for summary judgment on the ground, inter alia, that it possessed sovereign immunity from liability because on the date of Plaintiff's injury the Training Center did not carry liability insurance and therefore no waiver of sovereign immunity under Missouri law could apply. The trial court sustained that motion.

In order for plaintiff to prevail in this appeal, it is necessary to apply § 537.600.2 RSMo Supp. 1985 retroactively. We decline to do so in view of Yount v. Bd. of Educ. for City of St. Louis, 712 S.W.2d 455 (Mo.App. 1986); Anderson v. State, 709 S.W.2d 893, (Mo.App. 1986); and State ex rel Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission v. Appelquist, 698 S.W.2d 883 (Mo.App. 1985), which all hold that § 537.600.2 is not retroactive.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Sanderson v. Cincinnati Shaper Co. Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 17, 1987
725 S.W.2d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Sanderson v. Cincinnati Shaper Co. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LESTER SANDERSON, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE CINCINNATI SHAPER…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Mar 17, 1987

Citations

725 S.W.2d 931 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Wilkes v. Mo. Highway and Transp. Com'n

Section 537.600, RSMo 1986, is retroactive and applies to plaintiffs' claim. To the extent they indicate…

McCrory v. Mo. Highway and Transp. Com'n

The amendment added § 537.600.2 which states: "The express waiver of sovereign immunity in the instances…