From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. McGuire

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 26, 1968
405 F.2d 881 (5th Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 26461.

December 26, 1968.

Tommie Edward Sanders, pro se.

Edward F. Boardman, U.S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., Charles S. Carrere, Chief Trial Atty., Tampa, Fla., for appellees.

Before RIVES, BELL and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.


The appellant, who is serving a federal sentence for conviction under the Dyer Act in 1966, petitioned for habeas corpus. He contends that he is entitled to credit on this sentence for time which he spent in state custody, serving sentences imposed in 1967 for forgery and escape from jail.

The appellant's contention is refuted by the express provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3568. This Section states that such credit shall be awarded only for time "spent in custody in connection with the offense or acts for which sentence was imposed." When he was placed in state custody, the appellant was on probation relative to the federal offense for which he is now imprisoned. Since he was not in state custody "in connection with the [federal] offense," the appellant is not entitled to credit therefor on his federal sentence. See Dillinger v. Blackwell, D.C.N.D.Ga. 1967, 277 F. Supp. 389; United States v. Beeker, D.C.D.Md. 1967, 275 F. Supp. 608.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.


Summaries of

Sanders v. McGuire

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Dec 26, 1968
405 F.2d 881 (5th Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Sanders v. McGuire

Case Details

Full title:Tommie Edward SANDERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John McGUIRE, United States…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Dec 26, 1968

Citations

405 F.2d 881 (5th Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

Radcliffe v. Clark

J. J. CLARK, WARDEN 425 F.2d 238Davis,See 425 F.2d at 240 409 F.2d 830 WillisWillis 405 F.2d 881 425 F.2d 238…

Willis v. United States

Clearly Willis is not entitled to credit for the period of December 10 to December 30 or 31, 1968. During…