Opinion
No. 503, Docket 31371.
Argued June 14, 1967.
Decided June 20, 1967.
Benjamin Wyle, New York City, for appellant.
Belle Harper, New York City (I. Philip Sipser and Sipser, Weinstock Weinmann, New York City, on the brief), for appellees.
The order of the district court denying plaintiff's motion for a temporary injunction is affirmed. It is clear that the issuance of the requested injunction would result in greater harm to the defendants than the harm which plaintiff would suffer by reason of failure to issue the injunction. See Schenker v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours Co., 304 F.2d 880 (2d Cir. 1962); Nalco Chemical Co. v. Hall, 347 F.2d 90 (5th Cir. 1965).