From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanders v. City of Blytheville

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 31, 2023
3:22-cv-00040-KGB (E.D. Ark. Jan. 31, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00040-KGB

01-31-2023

BRIAN SANDERS PLAINTIFF v. BLYTHEVILLE, CITY OF DEFENDANT


ORDER

Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge

On December 6, 2022, the Court entered an Order denying, without prejudice plaintiff Brian Sanders' pro se motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 4). The Court ordered Mr. Sanders to within 30 days of entry of the Order pay the filing fee in full or file an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Id.). More than 30 days have passed since the entry of the Order, and Mr. Sanders has not responded to the Order by paying the filing fee or filing an amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court advised Mr. Sanders that his failure to respond to Court's Order could result in the dismissal of his lawsuit (Id., at 2). See Local Rule 5.5 of the Local Rules of the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas (“If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. Any party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”). Accordingly, the Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Sanders' complaint (Dkt. No. 1).

It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Sanders v. City of Blytheville

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 31, 2023
3:22-cv-00040-KGB (E.D. Ark. Jan. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Sanders v. City of Blytheville

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN SANDERS PLAINTIFF v. BLYTHEVILLE, CITY OF DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 31, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00040-KGB (E.D. Ark. Jan. 31, 2023)