Sanchez v. Mule Creek State Prison Warden

Full title: SAMUEL SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. MULE CREEK STATE PRISON WARDEN, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 23, 2015

2:15-cv-1903 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2015)

Opinion

SAMUEL SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. MULE CREEK STATE PRISON WARDEN, Respondent. No. 2:15-cv-1903 CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 23, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

         The application attacks a conviction issued by the Riverside County Superior Court. While both this court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Riverside County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

         Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and

         2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California.