From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 8, 2020
20-CV-0620 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-0620 (CM)

06-08-2020

MATTHEW SANCHEZ; TIANNA S. SANCHEZ, Plaintiffs, v. JUDGE MARTIN MILLER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL :

By order dated March 6, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiffs and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: June 8, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Miller

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 8, 2020
20-CV-0620 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2020)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Miller

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW SANCHEZ; TIANNA S. SANCHEZ, Plaintiffs, v. JUDGE MARTIN MILLER, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 8, 2020

Citations

20-CV-0620 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 8, 2020)