From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Frauenheim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 18, 2016
Case No. 1:15-cv-01756-DAD-SKO HC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 1:15-cv-01756-DAD-SKO HC

04-18-2016

CARLOS G. SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. S. FRAUENHEIM, Respondent.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING THAT THE COURT DISMISS PETITION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (Doc. 8)

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On March 8, 2016, the Court dismissed the petition with leave to amend within 30 days. Although more than 30 days have now passed, Petitioner has not filed an amended petition. Accordingly, the undersigned hereby RECOMMENDS that the Court dismiss the petition for failure to prosecute.

These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1). Within thirty (30) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Petitioner may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may constitute waiver of the right to appeal the District Court's order. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 ((9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). In lieu of filing objections, Petitioner may file the amended petition within thirty (30) days, and the undersigned will withdraw these findings and recommendations. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 18 , 2016

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Frauenheim

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 18, 2016
Case No. 1:15-cv-01756-DAD-SKO HC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2016)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Frauenheim

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS G. SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. S. FRAUENHEIM, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 18, 2016

Citations

Case No. 1:15-cv-01756-DAD-SKO HC (E.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2016)