From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Apr 15, 2013
Case No: 6:11-cv-1745-Orl-22GJK (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2013)

Opinion

Case No: 6:11-cv-1745-Orl-22GJK

04-15-2013

MARGARET SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER

This cause is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. No. 31) filed on March 26, 2013.

The United States Magistrate Judge has submitted a report recommending that the Motion be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

After an independent de novo review of the record in this matter, and noting that no objections were timely filed, the Court agrees entirely with the findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation.

Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation filed March 28, 2013 (Doc. No. 32), is ADOPTED and CONFIRMED and made a part of this Order.
2. The Plaintiff's Unopposed Application for Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Doc. No. 31) is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
3. The Commissioner is ORDERED to pay to Plaintiff $3,222.47 in attorney's fees.

DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on April 15, 2013.

______________________

ANNE C. CONWAY

United States District Judge
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Parties


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Apr 15, 2013
Case No: 6:11-cv-1745-Orl-22GJK (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Date published: Apr 15, 2013

Citations

Case No: 6:11-cv-1745-Orl-22GJK (M.D. Fla. Apr. 15, 2013)

Citing Cases

Graham v. Kijakazi

The assignment, though, is not valid unless it complies with the Anti-Assignment Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3727(b).…

Garcia v. Colvin

The assignment, though, is not valid unless it complies with the Anti-Assignment Act, 31 U.SC. § 3727(b). See…