From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sanchez v. Camp

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 30, 2021
3:20-cv-00416 BRW (E.D. Ark. Jun. 30, 2021)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00416 BRW

06-30-2021

JONATHON TABER SANCHEZ PLAINTIFF v. TREY CAMP, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

BILLY ROY WILSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants Trey Camp and Doyle Ramey filed a motion to dismiss this lawsuit because they were unable to contact Plaintiff Jonathan Taber Sanchez at his last known address. On May 19, 2021, United States Magistrate Judge Beth Deere entered an order directing Mr. Sanchez to respond to the Defendants' motion within 30 days. Mail subsequently sent to Mr. Sanchez at the last address he provided the Court (a post office box) has been returned to the Court as “undeliverable” indicating that the post office box had been closed. It has been over 30 days since Mr. Sanchez was directed to respond to the Defendants' motion, and he has not done so. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss is granted, and this case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2), failure to respond to court orders, and for failure to prosecute.

Doc. Nos. 13-15.

Doc. No. 16.

Doc. No. 11.

Doc. No. 18-19.

See also Miller v. Benson, 51 F.3d 166, 168 (8th Cir. 1995) (District courts have inherent power to dismiss sua sponte a case for failure to prosecute, and exercise of that power is reviewed for abuse of discretion).

IT IS ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sanchez v. Camp

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 30, 2021
3:20-cv-00416 BRW (E.D. Ark. Jun. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Sanchez v. Camp

Case Details

Full title:JONATHON TABER SANCHEZ PLAINTIFF v. TREY CAMP, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 30, 2021

Citations

3:20-cv-00416 BRW (E.D. Ark. Jun. 30, 2021)