From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

San Joaquin Valley R.R. Co. v. BNSF Ry. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (FRESNO DIVISION)
Jan 10, 2013
Case No.: 1:12-CV-01321-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:12-CV-01321-AWI-GSA

01-10-2013

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY, a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

LANG, RICHERT & PATCH, P.C. William T. McLaughlin II Ashley N. Emerzian Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY Respectfully submitted, HILL, FARRER & BURRILL LLP Paul M. Porter Stephen J. Tomasulo Attorneys for Defendant BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY


William T. McLaughlin II #116348
Ashley N. Emerzian, #278030
Lang, Richert & Patch
Post Office Box 40012
Fresno, California 93755-0012
(559) 228-6700 Phone
(559) 228-6727 Fax
Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE

TEMPORARY STAY OF ACTION


(Doc. 11)

The parties hereto, by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby agree and stipulate that good cause exists for a temporary stay in this action insofar as there are current efforts to resolve this action. The Parties are concurrently executing and filing a Request for Stay of the 9th Circuit Appeal in the related case, BNSF Railway Company v. San Joaquin Valley Railroad Company, et al., Case No. 1:08-CV-01086-AWI-SMS, 9th Circuit Court of Appeal Case No. 12-17111.

Accordingly, in the interests of avoiding the expenditure and waste of court time and attorneys fees pending final resolution of these matters, the parties hereby request that the Court order that this action be stayed until such time that either party requests that the stay be lifted or the Court determines that the stay be should be lifted or otherwise be amended.

Respectfully submitted,

LANG, RICHERT & PATCH, P.C.

By: __________________

William T. McLaughlin II

Ashley N. Emerzian

Attorneys for Plaintiff SAN JOAQUIN

VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY

Respectfully submitted,

HILL, FARRER & BURRILL LLP

By: __________

Paul M. Porter

Stephen J. Tomasulo

Attorneys for Defendant BNSF RAILWAY

COMPANY

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation, Plaintiff's Motion for stay is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be STAYED until further order of the Court. The parties shall file a joint report outlining the status of the settlement negotiations every ninety (90) days from the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Gary S. Austin

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

San Joaquin Valley R.R. Co. v. BNSF Ry. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (FRESNO DIVISION)
Jan 10, 2013
Case No.: 1:12-CV-01321-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2013)
Case details for

San Joaquin Valley R.R. Co. v. BNSF Ry. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY, a California Corporation, Plaintiff…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (FRESNO DIVISION)

Date published: Jan 10, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 1:12-CV-01321-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2013)