From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samy v. Enhanced Athlete, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 28, 2023
2:23-cv-01094-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01094-DAD-JDP 2:23-cv-01094-JDP

11-28-2023

MOHAMED SAMY, Plaintiff, v. ENHANCED ATHLETE, INC., Defendant.


DALE A. DROZD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE

JEREMY D. PETERSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a “Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate.” See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). According to Local Rule 305, both the district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the magistrate judge.

The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case be assigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.

Accordingly, it is ordered that this matter be reassigned from the docket of United States District Judge Dale A. Drozd to the docket of United States Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson, for all purposes including trial and entry of judgment. All currently scheduled dates, if any, presently set before Judge Drozd are hereby vacated. The parties shall take note that all future documents filed with the Clerk of the Court shall bear case number: 2:23-cv-01094-JDP.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.


Summaries of

Samy v. Enhanced Athlete, Inc.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 28, 2023
2:23-cv-01094-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2023)
Case details for

Samy v. Enhanced Athlete, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MOHAMED SAMY, Plaintiff, v. ENHANCED ATHLETE, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 28, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01094-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2023)