From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sampson v. Pullman Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1958
6 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

May 27, 1958


Although we are satisfied that there is an obligation on the part of the defendant, in the nature of a quasi-bailee, with respect to the luggage of passengers which may not under some circumstances be limited to the period when passengers are asleep at night, as in Goldstein v. Pullman Co. ( 220 N.Y. 549), we do not reach the question here. (See, also, 13 C.J.S., Carriers, § 914.) There is sufficient proof in the record to support a finding that the plaintiff failed to prove her freedom from contributory negligence. Under the circumstances, the determination of the Appellate Term is unanimously affirmed on the facts and the law, with costs to the respondents.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.


Summaries of

Sampson v. Pullman Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 27, 1958
6 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Sampson v. Pullman Company

Case Details

Full title:BESSIE SAMPSON, Appellant, v. PULLMAN COMPANY et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 27, 1958

Citations

6 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)